Jeff ([info]badlydrawnjeff) wrote,
@ 2007-10-16 09:45:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:general life, introspection, religion

So, about that poll
First, thanks for sharing. A couple surprises:

1) Sometimes it's fun to be reminded that you tend to associate with people that share similar values. It's hard for me to remember that, yes, I'm not always as alone in my thoughts on Big Issues as I often feel, and this was no different. I highly doubt a more scientific poll would peg 36% of people as agnostic or atheist, and even that number feels somewhat deflated considering my Catholic schooling and the chances that a good number of people I know from there may have voted (or, conversely, may not have).

2) Along the same lines, the tolerance numbers surprised me more than I thought. I assume people were being honest, but the tolerance issue is what most recently prompted the poll. Not to say I'm disappointed, because I'm not, but...well, I'll get there.

This actually all started due to a discussion w/[info]civic_oracle in another community, discussing the concepts of various perceptions of social priveleges. At one point, I had pointed out that I'm in a pretty interesting spot, having been a conservative in Massachusetts who doesn't believe in God. It got me thinking a bit more when I started looking at support groups for family members of Alzheimer's sufferers - one was at a church, and when I called them for more information, I asked how much the religious aspect was pushed and they said it was pretty critical, which isn't something I could honestly deal with on top of trying to muddle my way through everything else. Of course, with only one other group that I can't join, I'm shit out of luck, but that prompted a bigger eternal battle.

...(and this is where it's going to get jumbled, but I'm just writing at this point)...

First, I don't see my point of view on these issues changing - it took me a long time to get comfortable with the concept of not only being okay with not being religious, but being comfortable with being open about it and honest to myself. It's hard, very hard - I went to Catholic school my whole life, my immediate family was religious enough and I have lay clergy in my extended family, most of my close friends are largely religious to various degrees, and I subscribe to a political ideology that largely attracts religious figures and believers.

That's a lot to take in, and a lot to actively let go of.

Considering the very real internal battles I had - (and the following is strictly my opinion, and is not a judgement on anyone else's beliefs) - considering it was a very difficult decision to not get confirmed (possibly my first real ethical/moral/principled stand) in high school to my very real possibility of becoming a monk, it's something that never truly escapes me, even if I've moved on from not being sure (probably out of fear - a Pascal's Wager situation) to not allowing 20 years of relative indoctrination to govern the rest of a mind committed to logic and reason. Even in the last couple months, something that I can't prove and something that I can't relate to continues to shake my mental foundation more than a lot of other things. It's weird.

So I've been reading a lot of late, and the publishing topic du jour is books on atheism. There's the Christopher Hitchens approach (God sucks, religion sucks, and people's lives are miserable because of it), the Richard Dawkins approach (I'm a scientist who cannot believe in God due to X, Y, and Z), and a lot of books in between that I've skimmed but can't bother with much more. Having not been exposed to anything resembling academic atheism (and while I'd struggle to call the Hitchens book academic, Dawkins at least takes that approach), it's an interesting thing to read for me - for the first time in my life, I can actually hear some logical arguments beyond the ones I have to set up for myself.

The problem? I don't really like a lot of atheists.

Hitchens gets a pass on this one, because I enjoy him because he's a curmudgeon, but when I look at more, for lack of a better term, populist atheism, there's a lot of hatred involved. Hateful, self-important, egoistic ranting about how people who believe that some Invisible Man created everything are uneducated buffoons, or light-hearted but still uncomfortable poking and prodding, from stuff like the Flying Spaghetti Monster to other types of things. It runs the gamut, and it doesn't exactly make me comfortable.

In my extended family, I have some relatives now who are very, very religious. A type of religious I'm ultimately uncomfortable with at this stage of my personal development. They're also incredibly intelligent and wonderful people, which is great. This is not to say that my religious friends I have now (who I honestly know better than this group at this point) are not intelligent and wonderful, but this takes it to a different level than my two closest friends who I'd consider religious. I'd love to pick their brain and find out what brings them to this point, why they believe what they believe, etc. I know religious people who have turned to God because of personal struggles, or are because that's how they were brought up, but I haven't personally encountered folks who are strong believers who also are making strides to dedicate their lives to it, and who are semi-consistent prescences in my life.

The issue with this, however, is that I feel like one of those populist atheists I'm so bothered by. It's not to the point where I'm handing out literature or openly mocking them - I'm fine with people believing what they believe as a matter of personal serenity, but I won't lie - I don't get it and it causes a visceral, immediate reaction in my mind that's hard to shake. Sure, it's easy for me to move past it for people I've known for years and years, from my best friends to more distant ones, but that reaction when I meet someone new is hard to shake, and one I'm pretty damned ashamed of.

It's two-sided, though. I know there are likely evangelical types that are likely disgusted that folks like me exist - that I can't realistically be "saved" or whatever. I also know that there are probably people who read this who will be disgusted by me, and I can think of one person who could read this and be very disappointed, even though I still deeply admire nearly everything about him. But it's extremely tough to balance out - I can accept what you want to believe as long as it's not actively hurting anyone, but I'm going to struggle to accept that you believe it, especially if I otherwise respect your intelligence.

It's hard.

Atheism is interesting in practice, and I'm wondering if the 9 others who voted feel a similar pull - whether it be the initial reactions or the occasional loneliness that this type of thinking tends to harvest in me. It's equally funny to me, as I'm someone who's ultimately come to not care about what people generally think of me, as long as it's based on an accurate examination, but that I'd be so bothered by the inability to "belong" in this sort of instance. Whether it's to not feel "alone," or to get that piece of confirmation in a nation where only 6% of people feel the same way. In some ways, I'm not alone in my confliction, but it still feels like it. Is it something I can up and reveal in mixed company? Am I giving the benefit of the doubt in a way I won't get in return? I don't know.

I don't.

I want to know, though.

This is all over the place, and I apologise for that. But so's my mind - I'm a guy who can't fathom a "higher power," yet has deep respect for people who can dedicate their entire lives to it, even though he's not immediately okay with seeing it happen with otherwise intelligent people. It's a dichotomy that I'm still struggling with, and can't quite figure out. Go figure.



(Post a new comment)


[info]bridgegirl
2007-10-16 03:58 pm UTC (link)
Interestingly, I seem to be at a point in my life where religion is just a non-issue. I wasn't raised religious, and for a while, starting when I was a very young kid, I felt like I was missing out, and hoped to find a religion that resonated with me. But I never did, and now I'm pretty cool with that. I don't even usually like to call myself "atheist" or "agnostic," I'd rather just opt out of all of the terminology. So I usually just say "I'm not religious."

My aunt is a nun and had a Golden Jubilee celebration this past summer. I was sort of concerned about not knowing what to do in a Catholic church and accidentally offending someone, but I didn't really feeling like I was "living a lie" or whatever by going along with the ceremony. I mean, my relatives know that my mom stopped going to church at 18 and didn't raise us as Catholics. They knew that we were just there to be part of the family.

I'm not the kind of person who needs everything to be scientifically proven. Once it gets to that level of science it's usually sort of over my head anyway. I just know what resonates with me and what doesn't.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]badlydrawnjeff
2007-10-16 05:22 pm UTC (link)
Interestingly, I seem to be at a point in my life where religion is just a non-issue.

That's essentially the place I'm trying to get to. It's hard!

I'm not the kind of person who needs everything to be scientifically proven. Once it gets to that level of science it's usually sort of over my head anyway. I just know what resonates with me and what doesn't.

This is what I struggle with, though. What happens when something resonates and it's apparently false?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]bridgegirl
2007-10-16 09:22 pm UTC (link)
What happens when something resonates and it's apparently false?

Well...if it's apparent to me that it's false, I'd probably change my mind!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]amyawesome
2007-10-16 04:28 pm UTC (link)
I didn't vote because I don't really have an opinion. I believe in a christian god by default, but don't have much conviction in that, it's just easier for me.

(Reply to this)


[info]adorn
2007-10-16 04:42 pm UTC (link)
That was interesting to read. I was raised Catholic too and went to Catholic grade school, but chose to go to public high school with only about two people from my grade school. When were you supposed to have confirmation? We had ours in grade 8 and I seriously considered not doing it, but I would have been the only one and the pressure was too much. I'm glad I stuck to my plan of going to public high school though. I always felt like such a hypocrit in church because I never really understood the belief.

I guess the thing about atheists that I don't get is the same thing about religious people that I don't get: that strong conviction that they know what's true. I actually find it fairly arrogant to believe 100% that a god does or does not exist. I am open to all ideas of how the world was created, even if they involve purple elephants creating it all 10 years ago and altering our memories. Ok, so I don't really believe that theory, but I'm not entirely certain that it's not possible. Anyway, I would think it should be easier for atheists to understand religious people than it is for agnostics, since you both understand what it's like to really be sure about something.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]libation
2007-10-16 05:00 pm UTC (link)
Thanks for sharing this, Jeff. As you probably know religion is an interesting, puzzling topic for me too.

I agree with [info]adorn that many atheists can be just as gung-ho (anti-proselytizing?) as evangelical Christians. I guess it depends if you take it as an identity or more a state of mind.

Back to J--I had a similar experience except with Christianity, not Catholicism. To this day my mom still hopes that I will become Christian again someday. She absolutely cannot understand why I do not believe what she does. And I think it's harder for her because I didn't convert from Christianity to something else, I just . . . stopped being Christian. Occasionally I visit a liberal Christian church to see if I feel any inspiration or spark. Nope. I think I would have given up on it altogether long ago except my mother is such a strong example of faith and my father had just gotten ordained as a minister before he died. Christianity is almost more of a culture than a religion in my family, extended, on both sides. I feel like an outsider and spend very little time with relatives besides my mom, who has made it clear that even if she doesn't agree with me she doesn't want to let differing opinions come between us.

When we were all out at dinner one night my mother-in-law absolutely cracked up when my friend Boz told her he is an atheist. I have no idea what provoked that reaction. But it was pretty funny.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]badlydrawnjeff
2007-10-16 05:29 pm UTC (link)
When were you supposed to have confirmation?

If I recall correctly, around the junior year of high school - 16 or 17.

I guess the thing about atheists that I don't get is the same thing about religious people that I don't get: that strong conviction that they know what's true.

This is true. I think the differential is that, in most cases (yes, I'm generalizing), one position comes from faith and the other from reason. Not to say there isn't "reasoned faith" or "faith-based atheism," but what carries more weight, really?

Anyway, I would think it should be easier for atheists to understand religious people than it is for agnostics, since you both understand what it's like to really be sure about something.

You'd think so, right? Especially since so many people seem to move from religion to atheism, you think there'd be a little more acceptance of the beginnings.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]moditters
2007-10-16 05:56 pm UTC (link)
You're sincere, and that's amazing. Instead of being agenda-driven, making up your mind about the way you WANT things to be, you seem to be earnestly seeking for the truth. That's admirable. And I think that we'll find it eventually.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]badlydrawnjeff
2007-10-16 07:40 pm UTC (link)
I was especially curious as to your reaction. Thanks.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]greydruid
2007-10-16 11:37 pm UTC (link)
Hateful, self-important, egoistic ranting about how people who believe that some Invisible Man created everything are uneducated buffoons, or light-hearted but still uncomfortable poking and prodding, from stuff like the Flying Spaghetti Monster to other types of things. It runs the gamut, and it doesn't exactly make me comfortable.

Sounds like you have a problem with atheist proselytizers. I can relate. I don't like the Darwin fish or FSM, for instance; they smack of too much disrespect.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]cat_tat
2007-10-17 05:49 pm UTC (link)
I was one of the voting atheists. I generally live and let live, but I will certainly trot out Dawkins' arguments (or Sam Harris'), and the FSM, as a reaction to what feels like overly pushy, in-your-face Christian proselytizing or legislating. If people can live and let live and keep their religion out of my face, there's no need to invoke the FSM; if people want to have a genuine, respectful discussion about religion or spirituality such as Jeff has opened up here, or conversations I've had with Buddhists and Unitarians and Jews and Hindus, there's no reason to invoke FSM or Dawkins. For me, the FSM is a gesture of disrespect to be broken out when my beliefs are being disrespected by others.

I do think that Dawkins and other militants are doing atheism a disservice with their own proselytizing. I'd much rather hear him go on about his sense of wonder and awe at the laws of nature, with a firm caveat that it is nature and not a deity that is inspiring that in him, than about how religious people are morons. That doesn't really get us anywhere in terms of the larger conversation between atheists and believers, which I think is a dialogue that needs to take place.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]greyseal
2007-10-17 02:30 am UTC (link)
But it's extremely tough to balance out - I can accept what you want to believe as long as it's not actively hurting anyone, but I'm going to struggle to accept that you believe it, especially if I otherwise respect your intelligence.

Maybe I'm not quite grasping the gist of your post. Why do you struggle over accepting someone else's beliefs? I'm reading that you're not a fan of proselyting in any form, so it is unlikely you'd have friends of this ilk. If that's the case, why is there a struggle? Do the spiritual beliefs of others play into your relationships somehow?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]badlydrawnjeff
2007-10-17 02:43 am UTC (link)
I'm not sure I had a grand point other than some venting. I have a couple friends of that ilk, as well as family, and it's troubling. Luckily, outside of that, the beliefs haven't, but I'm still having trouble squaring the things I believe (my own beliefs, respect for others, and my own initial reactions), which is something I am working on and still need to work on.

If that makes any sense at all.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]greyseal
2007-10-17 03:31 am UTC (link)
Ahh, gotcha :) It does make sense.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]moditters
2007-10-17 02:44 pm UTC (link)
I know you're a David Wong fan (at least that's how I found the site), and this sounds a lot like his material from The God Fuse. It's basically about mutual respect. I know where you're coming from; there seems to be a gut instinct to be OFFENDED just by knowing someone else's contrary beliefs. I don't know where that reaction comes from, but there can be no civil discussion until I get past that reaction. Someone else's beliefs are not offensive; they're not a personal attack on me. Is that what you're getting at?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]badlydrawnjeff
2007-10-17 04:46 pm UTC (link)
I just looked it up - that pretty much nails it. The issue, I think, is that there's a bizarre conditioning, whether societal or otherwise, to be offended by otherwise harmless (harmless to others, I should say) belief systems.

It's a struggle for me because I'm usually able to shake that conditioning.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

It's not easy being serene. . .
[info]rainonlevs
2007-10-17 09:01 pm UTC (link)
I think the problem in many cases is that people don't honestly examine their own beliefs. They just accept them as absolutes that cannot be disputed or considered, only accepted or rejected. My experience with religious matters is that those who take the time to honestly examine their beliefs, like priests or religious scholars, are much more open to discussion.

I don't remember if I filled out the poll, but my answers are not private. I have spiritual beliefs, but not religious ones. I usually identify myself as a Zen Buddhist because that discipline's teachings have brought me the most enlightenment and inspiration. I do not reject any religion, though I may reject particular interpretations; if someone's religion helps them understand themselves and the world around them better, if it supports them and leads them to become more than they were, then I support that religion for them. I see religion, like science, as a tool to help us understand things that we cannot fully grasp ourselves.

But I was given plenty of room to determine those beliefs. I think many more people were under much more pressure. Maybe that's why so many of the notable atheists are so outspoken. Like early views of homosexual men as all flamingly outrageous, this may be because they are the only ones with the temerity to speak out.

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2007-10-18 08:27 am UTC (link)
It sounds like you're treating atheism AS a religion. Is that even logical?

(Reply to this)

hoping I'm not unwelcome here (litote +1)
[info]krinndnz
2007-10-23 11:54 pm UTC (link)
This made for a very interesting read. It's exactly the kind of soul-searching without self-importance that I like to think we ordinary people use LiveJournal for. I applaud your pursuit of your personal quest, and reading about it has made me think harder about my own.

I am an atheist (I wasn't around for your poll) and I tend to keep it fairly quiet. I too was raised Catholic and had a fair amount of catechism. I also am teaching myself Hebrew so that I can read some of the Bible in the original. I'm very fond of the Bible as literature (Current fixation: the transition from Solomon to Rehoboam and the troubles attending thereto).

I think that part of the obnoxiousness you're noticing about "populist atheism" is a conscious attempt to raise the profile of atheism, to get the concept into the public discourse. Sometimes it seems to be more important to Hitchens, Harris, and Dawkins to get across the message of "We are real, we exist, there are plenty of us!" than to get across the message of "We are normal people and we want a world in which the thing about us that you think is aberrant is a non-issue." At that level of generalization, it's the exact same dilemma (and desire) that requests for equality on the basis of race, gender, and sexuality are dealing with.

In my life, figuring out that Pascal's Wager was a very bad way of analyzing the situation nudged me towards atheism, although I too considered pursuing a collared life (the Jesuits are neat folk). I like to think of myself as culturally Catholic, but otherwise an atheist, the same way one sees atheist Jews sometimes.

Pardon me, but I'm about to slip into politics. I'm sure you've noticed that some of the religious movements intertwined with conservatism have a tendency to using religion as a cultural/tribal identifier, instead of adhering to the religion itself. That might account for some of your discomfort. I wouldn't suspect an atheist or agnostic conservative of being dragged to conservatism by their views on religion, but I would definitely so suspect a Mormon conservative, a Baptist conservative, or a Catholic conservative. There are several religious leaders who have said, in almost so many words, that you cannot be a true Christian if you are not a conservative. That annoys me. It feels like coercion because of the great authority that the structure of religious institutions give to the leaders of the institution.

I of course have a blind spot: if I'm not thinking about it hard, I'll assume that an atheist or agnostic liberal's views on religion led them to conservatism, but I won't usually assume that a Mormon liberal, a Baptist liberal, or a Catholic liberal were led to liberalism by their religious views. This despite the vigorous arguments some people like to make contending that Jesus was somewhere to the left of Dennis Kucinich. As well, the great authority that the structure of religious institutions gives to the leaders of the institution can of course be used to say "you cannot be a true Christian if you are not a liberal." People do say that, in fact. I want to acknowledge that out loud because I miss saying it when I get focused.

Politics aside, what I want for the world is a situation where everyone can freely investigate their own thoughts about their place in the universe, what happens after death, and the properties of Higher Powers on their own or with willing companions without fearing that their patriotism will be questioned, their moral judgment held suspect, or their ability to hold public office revoked because of those thoughts and views. I like to think that people in that situation would mull things over and head for Godlessville, but I also like about that situation that even if they don't, we residents of Godlessville wouldn't have such dangerous quarrels with our neighbors as we do now.

I also hope that there's more common ground with religious people than not. Humans are a lot more than our religion or lack of it. I think that the "populist atheism" will, in time, switch from that "we're here! get used to it!" message to "we're normal people."

We are.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: hoping I'm not unwelcome here (litote +1)
[info]badlydrawnjeff
2007-10-24 05:24 pm UTC (link)
Nah, you're cool.

I applaud your pursuit of your personal quest, and reading about it has made me think harder about my own.

Thanks!

I think that part of the obnoxiousness you're noticing about "populist atheism" is a conscious attempt to raise the profile of atheism, to get the concept into the public discourse.

This line is what kept me from replying until now - I've found I respond extremely negatively to populism (this may be a post all its own), and perhaps it's not that the people themselves are overly obnoxious as much as I see populism as overly obnoxious.

I'll have to think about that.

It feels like coercion because of the great authority that the structure of religious institutions give to the leaders of the institution.

I get that. I always wonder, though, how much the actual religion aspect comes into play. Are people who were religious, lapse, and keep their values and morals in a non-religious context somehow less likely to be thrown by, say, gay marriage? Is it the religion that drives that change, or are people who actively move away from a religious position simply more likely to adopt/be convinced by the views of those they meet in their new situation?

I should write a book.

Politics aside, what I want for the world is a situation where everyone can freely investigate their own thoughts about their place in the universe, what happens after death, and the properties of Higher Powers on their own or with willing companions without fearing that their patriotism will be questioned, their moral judgment held suspect, or their ability to hold public office revoked because of those thoughts and views.

I'm thankfully impressed at the amount of people who share this point of view on the matter. Hope is a nice thing, no?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…